List of American feminist literature - Wikipedia

As a contributor to What Manner of Woman: Essays on English and American Life and Literature (1977), one of the earliest collections of feminist literary criticism, and as the author of Woman’s Fiction: A Guide to Novels by and about Women in America,1820–1870 (1978), one of the foundational texts in the revival of critical interest in nineteenth-century women’s writing, Baym placed herself at the forefront of a newly vocal and visible group of academic feminists that included Annette Kolodny, Mary Helen Washington, Lillian Robinson, Lillian Faderman, Elaine Showalter, Sandra Gilbert, and Susan Gubar. Like the critical work of this first generation of academic feminists, several of Baym’s essays in Feminism and American Literary History are engaged in the revisionary work of analyzing both images of women and writings by women as a means of challenging conventional definitions of American women and traditional accounts of American literary history.

The following is a list of American feminist literature listed by ..

American Literary History | Oxford Academic

The essay, which opens Feminism and American Literary History ..

No one should be surprised intersectionalism reflects some of the same general principles as the American Nazi Party. Intersectionalism is racist, sexist and supremacist. It is arrogant. It is intolerant. It has no interest in law or equal rights and in fact uses power/privilege theory to abolish equal protection for others. Intersectionalism is paranoid and hateful. It has invented a whole new set of demonization theories based on empty European intellectualism and American radical lesbian ideological excuse notes from teacher. Despite it's bleating, intersectionalism produces nothing, no new thoughts, new and interesting intersections and perceptual shifts. It is painfully dogmatic, illiberal and sluggish, and above all unaware. It is incapable of true satire, expressing irony or of employing metaphors. Intersectionalism is narcissistic, obsessive, self-contradictory and full of semantic gibberish. Intersectionalism routinely lies about history and current events with the goal of propaganda. It has no interest in literature or the arts except to advance its world view and stifle those it disagrees with. In fact intersectionalism is almost brutally illiterate, especially in its lack of art appreciation. Intersectionalism is manic in its myopic outlooks and identity centrism. The narrow spectrum of its provincialism and exposure to and experience with other world cultures is the opposite of what it claims for itself. In terms of events, intersectionalism uses an American-centric parochial lens analogous to an identity laden Jim Crow it smears over the entire world and its history. It considers any contact with its own gay, non-white and female identities to be in itself mind expanding and an exemplar of a range of diverse thought. In fact intersectionalism is conformist and static in its thinking. It is hypocritical to the point of delusion in that it regularly encourages acts for itself it forbids in others, setting up rules only others must obey. Its hatred of men, whites and heterosexuals is phobic, endemic and feral. In short intersectionalism is exactly the sort of ideology one might expect would be created and taken up by people ranging from the insane and sociopathic to merely stupid, conceited, ignorant and uneducated.

Feminism and American Literary History

Why so many such people are drawn to SF is anybody's guess, but it's killing the genre, and the literature they're producing and reading is the worst in the history of science fiction, at least in America. In an era of rampant relativism, no one should be surprised madness and paranoia are being mainstreamed as reasonable. Intersectionalism is notorious for giving full weight to the most hysterical fears among its coterie. What could be more obvious or neurotic than people who provisionally claim an interest in SFF who never express that interest without hysterically defaming tens of millions of ethnic European heterosexual men? For want of better words to describe such a bizarre and focused obsession, that's just plain nuts. Given that, it's no surprise a simple majority of over 50% of the intersectionalist women in SFF I've researched openly admit to mental health issues in a country where 6 to 9% of people ever claim to experience such things. Quotes like and "23% of women in their 40s and 50s take antidepressants, a higher percentage than any other group" are suggestive, but of what?

Below is an essay on
It was the period of colonial and revolutionary literature, and the greatest representatives of American essayists there were:

Feminist literary criticism - Wikipedia

Given this plurality of interests, our fields of critical investigation are wide-ranging. In addition to more traditionally defined areas of scholarship, our work addresses a variety of media (including print, sound, photography, and film) and discursive genres (including confessional literature, political treatises, and legal cases). We have particular strength in African American literary and film studies, gender studies, cinema and media studies, and histories and theories of the public sphere, as well as of privacy and intimacy.

American Literature”

A History of Feminist Literary Criticism Essay - 149501 …

. "Rewriting Afro-American Literature: A Case for Black Women Writers." 6 (May 1977): 10-14. Reprinted in Politics of Education: Essays from , eds. Robert C. Rosen, Leonard Vogt, and Michael Apple, (Albany: State University of New York, 1990).

Shockley, Ann Allen.

Feminism and Literary Criticism Essay ..

Diversity is a racialist feminist shill. If you think about the wide variety of viewpoints of America's pop culture expressions of films, literature and music and then see how falsely narrow that becomes within intolerant feminist dialogues the idea of diversity becomes perverse. The supposed idea is that an increase in gay, women's and non-white perspectives increases one's perspectives and yet at the same time the only perspectives truly welcome within intersectional feminism are scrimmed through an ideological lens that is routinely narrow and provincial as it is hysterical. However, which perspective is welcome is itself a matter of perspective.